Management and leadership Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Management and leadership - Research Paper Example Another difference between management and leadership is related to their approach and perspectives. At Boeing, managers always think incrementally and they do everything in accordance with the company’s policy, whereas leaders think radically and they follow their own initiations in the benefit of the company. The Boeing Company hires managers based on their managerial as well as leadership skills. The company believes that a good manager is one who can motivate and lead the employees effectively by setting his/her own example. Leadership is one of the main elements of Boeing’s culture. It has its roots in every department as all managers lead the employees towards increased performance and productivity. Rampur (2010) states, â€Å"In the corporate world, leadership is undoubtedly the most important action that has to be considered if you want to get the work done collectively†. Every department of Boeing works in partnership with the Boeing Leadership Center that works towards ensuring on-the-job successes by providing leadership development opportunities to the managers of all departments. Managers working at Boeing not only manage and control their employees according to the company’s employee management policy but also help them achieve their tasks in an appropriate manner. Boeing’s senior management support matrix structure and provide clear direction to the employees. They possess all qualities of good leaders, such as, assertiveness, visionary outlook, and skills to influence others. The core essence of a true leader is to improve organizational processes by motivating and influencing the employees. Every department of the Boeing Company strives to improve at all levels and that is not possible if the managers do not possess leadership skills. Therefore, we can say that although the concepts of management and leadership have some differences but every manager working at Boeing possesses both managerial and leadership skills to ensure

Why did Slavery Come to be the Dominant Labor System in the Southern Essay

Why did Slavery Come to be the Dominant Labor System in the Southern Colonies - Essay Example The workforce in the agricultural sector in the southern colonies was mainly comprised of Europeans servants who worked on indenture basis. Although the Europeans still offered labor, African slaves were the better choice for planters because they were cheap to maintain and more productive. By mid 17th century there was a massive shift towards slave labor in the south since demand for food was rising with expanding markets. At this time Africans had started to be shipped and be sold as slaves to Americans. The climate and soil in the south were more favorable for agriculture than those of the north. This made the sound to be heavily dependent on labor for development of plantations. The south as stated above was an ideal region for agriculture all year round and crops like tobacco and rice thrived well. These crops are labor intensive and the lands were quite vast. Therefore, a huge potential of the southern lands remained untapped considering that there were many waterways where cro ps could be transported to overseas markets. As these farms grew labor shortages became intense and by the end of the 17th century more than 500 Africans had been bought as slaves to meet the demand (Schneider and Schneider 48). This trend was soon followed by withdrawal of indentured European servants since many had saved enough to buy their own land and start farming. America was quite big and unexploited by then and the Europeans found no reason not to venture into far away lands. The Bacon’s Rebellion also saw many planters release white servants as they proved to be a danger to political stability. In this regards an alternative had to be sought to counter the exodus of the white servants. By mid 18th century a total of 235,000 Africans were in America and 85% of them worked in the southern colonies of Virginia, Georgia, North and South Carolina (73). African slaves however came to be fully exploited after failed trials were made on Native Americans (Rodriguez 106). Many of them died from European diseases while many others ran away since they knew the land better than the Europeans. This left the planters no choice but to take in African slaves. This followed a massive expansion of plantations in Georgia and South Carolina which translated to increased production levels of rice and tobacco. These slaves did a great deal of work which the white servants had refused to do for example draining of swamps. West Africans came in handy especially in rice growing plantations since they were familiar with the kind of work required as their mother lands grew rice. Slaves worked for 15 hours on a daily basis especially during the harvest season (Norton and Sheriff 27). One overseer was required to supervise a minimum of 20 slaves doing back-breaking work and when a slave lazed around, the overseer was supposed to whip them. The fact that slaves were cheap to buy and maintain saw planters buy them in masses so as to plant and cultivate more. As earlier indica ted slaves used to work for many hours per day which translated to bumper harvests and therefore booming plantation business. Many plantation owners like the Byrd family from Virginia turned to be quite wealthy (58). Such families came together to form elite classes of planters in the southern states who ensured that slave trade remained because it was a lifeline to their wealth. Southern colonies had vast fertile lands for agriculture where Europeans worked as servants on indenture basis. The vastness and the need to grow crops on large scale raised the need to have more workers. Slave trade was on the rise by mid 17th century and it saw many planters buy African slaves to work in